I am amazed that how Mark Mullen, NBC News Correspondent, said to his readers about Cafferty’s comments on “thugs and goons” when referring Chinese with this language (following sentence in quote is copied and pasted from his blog) in his blog titled : “IN BEIJING, PLENTY OF PRO-CHINA FREE SPEECH”: “The driver was referring to CNN commentator Jack Cafferty, who made a comment on air about China’s leaders being “thugs and goons” – which has been taken as a personal affront by the nation of 1.3 billion people.”
Please note that Mark used words “CNN commentator Jack Cafferty, who made a comment on air about China’s leaders” in his article. But, if you watch the video or read the script of Jack Cafferty’s comments, you will find that Jack Cafferty did not refer to “Chinese leaders” in stead of “Chinese”.
How many readers believe what Mark said was true? I don’t know. But ,when you read the comments posted by his readers, you can see a lot of them believe what Mark said.
Why Mark did this? I don’t know. I cannot guess what his motivation is. Did he tell you the truth?
You are the judge after you watch Cafferty’s comments on video or its script.
Here is the link for you to watch Cafferty’s comments:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=584D5fHB2H4
Many Chinese oversea, who cannot be brainwashed by Chinese governement in any way and have been watching a lot of news from CNN and NBC, feel offended and are angry about Caffety’s comments. They also have taken the Cafferty’s comment as a “personal affront” (in Mark’s language).
I don’t know how Mr. Mark Mullen can explain this to his readers?
A journalist should have his professional standard. If a journalist lies to you, do you still consider him or her a true journalist?
If a journalist thinks you are an idiot and will believe what he or she reports to you and you take what he/she reported to you, you are a true idiot.
Share This